Separate Principles of Spatial Planning in the Border Regions on the Example of Meghri Community

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54338/27382656-2022.3-014

Keywords:

border region, settlement, security, road network, infrastructures, access to services

Abstract

The paper aims to apply such principles of territorial planning in border areas and regions under the threat of war, which will allow to meet the primary needs of the population under relatively peaceful conditions and, in emergency situations, will reduce the vulnerability of territories and populations. To solve this problem, the issues specific to the border regions and principles of their classification were studied, which were found both in international documents and in scientific publications. In the example of the Meghri community of Syunik Marz, RA, such factors directly related to spatial planning, such as geographical location; natural, economic, and cultural resources; territorial placement of settlements; population; and infrastructure, were investigated. To solve the problem of access to public services, the infrastructures for providing the primary needs of the population were selected and categorized according to access levels. The study's findings led to recommendations for using these spatial planning concepts, which will guarantee that all the residents in the community's settlements have access to services.

Author Biographies

Sargis Tovmasyan, National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia

Doctor of Science (Architecture), Associate Professor (RA, Yerevan) - National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia, Head of the Science Department

Hayk Zirakyan, National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia

(RA, Yerevan) - National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia, 1st-year Master Student at the Faculty of Architecture

References

C. Langer, M. Fernández-Götz, Boundaries, Borders and Frontiers: Contemporary and Past Perspectives. eTopoi. Journal for Ancient Studies, 7, 2020, 33-47. Doi:10.17169/refubium-28207

K. Goettlich, From Frontiers to Borders: The Origins and Consequences of Linear Borders in International Politics: PhD thesis, The London School of Economics & Political Science, 2019. p/http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3875/1/Goettlich__from-frontiers-to-borders.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.563

M. Rigg. The Relevance of Borders in the 21st Century. Master thesis, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Air University, Alabama, 2017. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1047350.pdf

C. Sohn. The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-Border Metropolis Hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38 (5), 2014, 1697-1711. Doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071

A.V. Kuznetsov, О.V. Kuznetsova, The Changing Role of Border Regions in the Regional Policies of the EU and Russia. Baltiyskiy region, 11 (4), 2019, 58-75 (in Russian). Doi:10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-4

S. Sassen, When the center no longer holds: Cities as frontier zones. Cities, 34, 2013, 67-70. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.007

В. Van der Velde, R. Martin, So Many Regions, so Many Borders: A Behavioural Approach in the Analysis of Border Effects. Rome, Italy, 1997. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/139446

L.G. Osmolovskaya, Funktsii granitsy kak faktor razvitiya prigranichnykh regionov i formirovaniya transgranichnykh regionov. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 1, 2016, 45-54 (in Russian).

V.A. Potosyan, HH sahmanamerdz gotum gyughakan bnakavayreri mardak’anaki taratsashrjanayin arrandznahatkut’yunnery yev arrka khndirnery, Bulletin of Yerevan university, 52(2), 2018, 118-124 (in Armenian).

Yu.A. Safaryan, J.N. Muradyan, S.A. Tovmasyan, M.M. Davtyan. Hayastani Hanrapetutyan tuyl yuratsvats taratsashrjanneri kaghakashinutyan kayun zargatsman ughinery.

Printing and Information Center of National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia, Yerevan, 2011 (in Armenian).

A. Firyan, Border Zone Characteristics as a Social Conflict Area. Collection of Scientific Articles, International Scientific–Educational Center of NAS RA, 2018, 219-227.

S.A. Tovmasyan, Principles and Methodology of Assessment Vulnerability of Rural Communities of the Republic of Armenia. Scientific Papers of National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia, 1(64), 2017, 70-79 (in Armenian).

V.I. Slipchenko, Voyny shestogo pokoleniya. Oruzhiye i voyennoye iskusstvo budushchego. Veche, Moscow, 2002 (in Russian).

Downloads

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

Tovmasyan, S., & Zirakyan, H. (2022). Separate Principles of Spatial Planning in the Border Regions on the Example of Meghri Community . Journal of Architectural and Engineering Research, 3, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.54338/27382656-2022.3-014

Issue

Section

Articles